If you already used the first version of SccTextX, you may got an error like "Wrong SCCTEXTX version"
when doing check-ins or Check-Outs. This is because all SCCTEXT versions write an identifier into the SCA/VCA/FRA texxtfiles.
If you open those files with any texteditor, the very first line reads something like "SCCTEXT Version 4.0.0.2". This is the version string of the original MS-routine as well as the PL_SCCTEXT.PRG as well as again in this new version from 2008-11-12.
Only in the first incarnation of SCCTEXTX I had that clever idea to change that string to advertise "SCCTEXTX version 1.0.0.1". Looking back, this was a bad idea, since it renders all your old files useless ;) Thus in the new version I reverted that change back to the original string. The second upload from today now additionally accepts both version strings, thus you shouldn't get any compatibility problems anymore.
wOOdy
"*´¨)
¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´. (¸.•` *
.•`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic !
(¸.•``••*
when doing check-ins or Check-Outs. This is because all SCCTEXT versions write an identifier into the SCA/VCA/FRA texxtfiles.
If you open those files with any texteditor, the very first line reads something like "SCCTEXT Version 4.0.0.2". This is the version string of the original MS-routine as well as the PL_SCCTEXT.PRG as well as again in this new version from 2008-11-12.
Only in the first incarnation of SCCTEXTX I had that clever idea to change that string to advertise "SCCTEXTX version 1.0.0.1". Looking back, this was a bad idea, since it renders all your old files useless ;) Thus in the new version I reverted that change back to the original string. The second upload from today now additionally accepts both version strings, thus you shouldn't get any compatibility problems anymore.
wOOdy
"*´¨)
¸.•´¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´. (¸.•` *
.•`.Visual FoxPro: It's magic !
(¸.•``••*